[PD] why not Purr Data?

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Oct 3 09:45:14 CEST 2017

On 2017-10-02 18:11, Patrice Colet wrote:
> Purr Data looks like a continuity of pd-extended, anyway all pd versions
> are obsolete since they aren't fully 64bit compatible.

weird i've been using Pd on 64bit systems almost exclusively for the
last 10 years.
what makes you think that they are not fully 64bit compatible?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171003/9862af31/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list