[PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

Roman Haefeli reduzent at gmail.com
Tue Oct 3 11:59:08 CEST 2017

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
> This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the
> -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently
> offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly
> inconsistent behaviors...

Ah, that's good to know and a crucial factor for being compatible with
Pure Data. And I can confirm that with -legacy the GUIs of the patches
I tested are usable (GUI wise) and look good in Purr Data now. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171003/e2f7227a/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list