[PD] Do I need 2 Gem/PD instances for this application

Peter P. peterparker at fastmail.com
Mon Dec 11 21:45:41 CET 2017


* IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> [2017-12-11 12:05]:
> On 2017-12-11 10:19, Peter P. wrote:
> > * IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> [2017-12-10 18:56]:
> >> On 12/10/2017 04:40 PM, Peter P. wrote:
> >>>> [pix_snap] +  [pix_buffer] + [makefilename]
> >>> So [pix_write] cound become an abstraction that holds the above objects
> >>> maybe.
> >>>
> >>
> >> patches/PRs welcome.
> > Just curious, if [pix_write] would become an abstraction as described
> > avove how would one do the encoding of still images saved from
> > [pix_buffer] into a (compressed) video file without using external tools
> > (ffmpeg, mencoder) then?
> 
> price question: how would you do that with [pix_write] as a binary (as
> is now)?
Sorry, mixed it up with [pix_record].



More information about the Pd-list mailing list