[PD] Do I need 2 Gem/PD instances for this application

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Dec 11 12:04:58 CET 2017

On 2017-12-11 10:19, Peter P. wrote:
> * IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> [2017-12-10 18:56]:
>> On 12/10/2017 04:40 PM, Peter P. wrote:
>>>> [pix_snap] +  [pix_buffer] + [makefilename]
>>> So [pix_write] cound become an abstraction that holds the above objects
>>> maybe.
>> patches/PRs welcome.
> Just curious, if [pix_write] would become an abstraction as described
> avove how would one do the encoding of still images saved from
> [pix_buffer] into a (compressed) video file without using external tools
> (ffmpeg, mencoder) then?

price question: how would you do that with [pix_write] as a binary (as
is now)?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171211/07e3d118/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list