[PD] pix_film performances question
Nicola Pandini
nicola.pandini at gmail.com
Sun Dec 17 17:00:31 CET 2017
Oh, good news, thanks. I'll try to compile and test that.
Il 17/12/2017 14:30, Antoine Rousseau ha scritto:
> Hi,
> this should be fixed in next release, with:
> https://github.com/umlaeute/Gem/pull/138 "change sleep time of
> pix_film's grabThread() from 100us to 5ms"
>
>
> Antoine Rousseau
> http://www.metalu.net <http://metalu.net> __
> http://www.metaluachahuter.com/
> <http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/>
>
>
> 2017-12-17 11:16 GMT+01:00 Nicola Pandini <nicola.pandini at gmail.com
> <mailto:nicola.pandini at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I've a problem with a patch with a lot of pix_film objects.
>
> I noticed that pix_film starts consuming cpu when it loads a
> video, and it never reduce the consuming, even when playback is
> stopped, or when its gemhead is disabled.
> Is it a bug? Are there any workarounds?
>
> --
> Nicola Pandini
> t
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at lists.iem.at> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
>
>
--
Nicola Pandini
http://nicolapandini.damai.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20171217/23fa7a6b/attachment.html>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list