[PD] readsf re-blocked up-sampled

Marco Matteo Markidis mm.markidis at gmail.com
Sun Mar 4 21:53:48 CET 2018

I expect that using [readsf~] in a re-blocked and up-sampled patch is
usefull to have the same played back file but trying to avoid glitches.

2018-03-04 21:18 GMT+01:00 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:

> On 03/04/2018 06:39 PM, Marco Matteo Markidis wrote:
> > Dear Miller,
> >
> > thank you for your patch. Anyway, until here I have been arrived. The
> point
> > is that if you connect this [readsf~] to a [dac~] in the parent window it
> > sounds 64-times higher and shorter. There is something that I am missing?
> what do you expect?
> none of Pd's soundfile reading/writing objects do any resampling.
> so if you play back a 22.05kHz soundfile in a patch running on 44.1kHz
> it will be played back at double speed (with double pitch and halt the
> duration).
> gfmadsr
> IOhannes
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/
> listinfo/pd-list

Ho cambiato l'indirizzo email in mm.markidis at autistici.org . Se non è un
problema, scrivimi a questo nuovo indirizzo email.

I changed my email address in mm.markidis at autistici.org . If it is ok for
you, please write me to this new email address.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180304/6fee2b27/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list