[PD] [closebang] issue ...

[José de Abreu]

Save on patching closing is a strong point for having a native closebang.

But, on the other side, why is not good to have closebang as native?

Em Qua, 29 de ago de 2018 08:39, oliver <oliver at klingt.org> escreveu:

>
> >> or even that PD would need a native [closebang] ;-)
> >>
> >
> > why?
> > (of course you could wish for each and every object that is currently
> > not native to Pd to be included; but what makes [closebang] so special
> > that it should be included? it's widespread use cases?)
>
> well, it would make sense as a complementary object to [loadbang] and
> yes, i use it frequently to do save-on-patch-closing stuff. which is how
> i stumbled across the "order" problem with iemguts' [closebang].
>
> but of course, that's really only a personal preference, and so far i'm
> fine using externals.
>
> best
>
> oliver
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20180829/5f959ac8/attachment.html>