[PD] slop~ (new object for 0.50) and the "slew" term

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

Em ter, 23 de jul de 2019 às 19:20, Miller Puckette <msp at ucsd.edu> escreveu:

> q105 is a true slew limiter but that whoever's selling it
> on that page misunderstood what it does.


Yeah, might as well be just that :) Nonetheless, in slop~, you have a
"linear region" and the other inlets that are "asymptotic". So if you have
"0" for the 3th/5th inlets and the same input value for asymptotic
upwards/downwards region, you basically have a "simple" one pole filter.
More precisely, something that could be implemented with fexpr~ as:

[fexpr~ $y1 + (($x1-$y1) * $f2)], where $f2 is the cuttof frequency in
radians per sample.

At least that's where I got when I tried to simplify this down.

My point is that you can achieve this kind of filtering which is quite
different than a slew limiter. But then, could it be a misappropriation of
the object? Like, is this there not to be used on its own, but in
conjunction with other parameters?

But one way or another, seems I should really change the name of my "slew"
object :)

thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20190723/665919bd/attachment.html>