[PD] [PD-announce] timbreID 0.8.1

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Thu Aug 1 22:41:49 CEST 2019

Em qui, 1 de ago de 2019 às 13:27, William Brent <william.brent at gmail.com>

> Hi Alex, thanks for taking a look. Yes - the reason I ended up calling the
> single library binary timbreIDLib is that there was already a [timbreID]
> object in the library. I just wanted to avoid confusion. Looking back, I
> wish I had named that object something else. At this point I think I'd
> rather live with an awkwardly named library rather than change the name of
> any individual object within it, but I'm open to suggestions.

My suggestion was to change the name of library, not the object. But I
don't really understand the challenges involved (haven't really checked the
code structure). Though I think it's feasible. What do you say? Have you
considered it and thought it wasn't possible or worth it?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20190801/8d3ab856/attachment.html>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list