[PD] GOP drawing bug with scalars and z-order - test in [jmmmp/multiarray]
Christof Ressi
christof.ressi at gmx.at
Fri Sep 20 13:50:10 CEST 2019
> Pd doesn't care about z-ordering at all and the order of drawing is
> mainly defined by "what needs to be done" (rather than: "how will it
> look like").
I don't agree that there is no defined z-ordering in Pd, otherwise you couldn't reliably build GUIs. Just imagine that a background canvas would suddenly display in front of a slider. Generally, objects are drawn in the order of creation, it's just that sometimes things get messed up when scalars are involved. Or to quote João:
> Afaik, GOP redrawing works well with other types of objects, but not with scalars.
So I also think there is a bug with scalar drawing and I've experienced similar situations (but didn't have to patience to narrow it down).
Christof
> Gesendet: Freitag, 20. September 2019 um 12:24 Uhr
> Von: "IOhannes m zmölnig" <zmoelnig at iem.at>
> An: pd-list at lists.iem.at
> Betreff: Re: [PD] GOP drawing bug with scalars and z-order - test in [jmmmp/multiarray]
>
> On 9/20/19 11:26 AM, João Pais wrote:
> > z-order is lost (or changed)
>
> z-ordering is based on the order of drawing commands (things drawn later
> will paint on top of what is already there).
> Pd doesn't care about z-ordering at all and the order of drawing is
> mainly defined by "what needs to be done" (rather than: "how will it
> look like").
>
> adding z-ordering to Pd probably requires a bit of rewriting of the
> current code...
>
> gamdsr
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list