[PD] send~ receive~ throw~ catch~ inlet~ outlet~ latency
christof.ressi at gmx.at
Wed Nov 6 14:29:13 CET 2019
No, they don't. They are not part of the DSP graph.
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 06. November 2019 um 14:17 Uhr
> Von: "Roman Haefeli" <reduzent at gmail.com>
> An: pd-list at lists.iem.at
> Betreff: Re: [PD] send~ receive~ throw~ catch~ inlet~ outlet~ latency
> On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 10:13 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> > the *only* safe way to guarantee a certain order of execution for
> > signal
> > objects is by making their dependencies explicit.
> > the only way to make dependencies explicit is to use signal
> > connections
> > (which involves inlet~ and outlet~ when it comes to subpatches)
> So, the non-signal iolets do _not_ influence order of execution for
> signal objects?
> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list