[PD] [clone] with individual signal inlets/outlets exposed ?

[Alexandre Torres Porres]

I guess making noise on the list helps :) it narrows down to someone also
feel it's worth it and implement it, aren't you a skilled fellow anyway? I
think this one is over my head... I'm still only able to managing lower
hanging fruits :P

Em sex., 5 de jun. de 2020 às 15:30, baptiste chatel <
baptiste.chatel at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Is there a way to nicely "upvote" this request other than commenting the
> issue ?
>
> Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 20:16, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> I already made that request by the way
>> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/500
>>
>> Em sex., 5 de jun. de 2020 às 14:51, baptiste chatel <
>> baptiste.chatel at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Would it be possible to have a [clone] option that allows clones
>>> individual signal inlets/outlets to be exposed ?
>>>
>>> An example : i need to make 64 of the following patch :
>>> [receive~ thing-$1]
>>> |
>>> [outlet~]
>>> that should go to a matrix, $1 in [1:64].
>>>
>>> [clone] is useless because it will sum all outputs and expose only one,
>>> since the cloned patch has one output.
>>>
>>> I could do it with dynamic patching, but as practical as it could be, it
>>> is pretty convoluted to use for such a simple need.
>>>
>>>
>>> Baptiste
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at lists.iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20200605/2d593fb3/attachment.html>