[PD] A strange question (yet again)

Pierre Alexandre Tremblay tremblap at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 10:59:56 CET 2022


Ok lovely people. I cleaned it, and I even did a similar thing to João’s 'dynamic patching' to see if it would be faster. In my case, it is unusably slow for 300x400 for the struct version, and it beachballs completely with the ‘dynamic patching’ approach.

Even more funny is, if you save the patch once it is drawn, the file is now huge and cannot load ;)

I’ve included both patches for 30x40 for fun. At that size they both work relatively well. Now, change the numbers to 300 and 400 for less fun :) Any pointers to optimisation and/or other ideas welcome

p

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test-spectrogram-canvas.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20220121/47c854a6/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test-spectrogram-struct.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1444 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20220121/47c854a6/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20220121/47c854a6/attachment.bin>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list