[PD] update on Gem for Apple Silicon?

IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri Jun 2 09:02:33 CEST 2023


On 5/10/23 21:51, John Harrison wrote:
> Is Gem for Apple Silicon on anybody's radar? I'm up for being part of a
> team to get Gem on Apple Silicon if there's interest.
> 

just for the record: since yesterday there's snapshot builds of Gem 
available on deken.
- this is a snapshot of the current git 'master'. there hasn't been a 
release. things might be more broken then in a normal release (on the 
upside: if you report bug, they are fixed faster than in a normal release)
- there is only a single version "0.94-snapshot". the package will be 
updated whenever a i change something in the git repository. there is no 
turning back (if things worked with yesterday's snapshot, but not with 
the one downloaded today, then you are out of luck)
- Windows: both 32bit and 64bit binaries are available
- macOS: the binary is universal (amd64 and arm64). they should run at 
least on "Big Sur" (i've tested them[*] on Catalina/amd64 and Monterey/M1)
- Linux: there are binaries available, but unlike with Windows/macOS 
binaries, there are no dependencies included. I do advise Linux people 
to just build Gem themselves (or use a distribution that offers packages 
for Gem's git snapshots). this is because on Linux you typically have a 
proper package manager (that allows you to easily install all the stuff 
needed, starting with a compiler), whereas on macOS/Windows you don't 
(unless you count the variants of "app stores" - which I don't).
  the pre-built binaries will most likely not work out of the box on 
your system. (having said that: the binaries where produced on a 
Debian/bullseye system, so if you are running something similar it 
should be possible to just install the missing dependencies with your 
package manager; a good start is to just install the "gem" package that 
comes with your distribution, as this should pull in most dependencies)

gfds
IOhannes


[*] "testing" means a casual check of whether things work on some random 
snapshot. there are no formal tests verifying the integrity of the deken 
packages, so: what has probably worked yesterday, might not work today.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20230602/d4006385/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list