[OT] Re: [PD] Plugin~ object!

[mik]

No, MDK still has 2.96. I had a lot of problems with MDK, especially when
compiling C++. Their customization of the Linux base system and tools goes a
bit too far, IMHO. It's extremely easy to set up though (which takes away
all the fun :-) ).

mik


----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Dobson" <RWD at cableinet.co.uk>
To: "pd-list" <pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at>
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [PD] Plugin~ object!


> I'm currently using Mandrake 7.2 - which has proved a bad move (from RH
> 6) as it does not configure my SoundBlaster 16 properly - I have to do
> it by hand each time I boot into Linux. Which is probably why I don't
> boot into it very often! RH6 didn't have this problem. According to the
> Mandrake 8 box, it uses the unofficial gcc 2.96 that was such a problem
> with Redhat 7. Does Mdk 8.1 fix that? I have heard that RH 7.2 does
> restore the proper 2.95 gcc.
>
>
> Richard Dobson
>
> Damien HENRY wrote:
> >
> > mandrake 8 & 8.1 are very good.
> >
> > Le Samedi 24 Novembre 2001 07:01, ludwig zeininger a écrit :
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Michal Seta wrote:
> > > ::BTW, speaking of not messed up distros.
> > > ::Can someone tell me which one isn't messed up?
> > > ::My RH7 is driving me crazy lately.
> > > ::I would like to upgrade to something less messed up.
> > > ::I've had only experience with RH.
> > > ::How easy is it to switch to say, debian.
>
> --
> Test your DAW with my Soundcard Attrition Page!
> http://www.bath.ac.uk/~masrwd (LU: 18th July 2001)
> CDP: http://www.bath.ac.uk/~masjpf/CDP/CDP.htm (LU: 1st August 2001)
>
>
>