[Pdweb] a place for ... GEM

[Steffen]

On 10/06/2007, at 21.05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> furthermore i am thinking about setting adding the plone-software- 
> center
> to the puredata.info page, which is a system for releasing files,
> bugtracking and documenting software.

I'm not 100% sure how this software work, but having such features  
for different members small to big puredata projects sounds nice.  
However,
1) how does it differ from the current settings if it had a bugtracker?
2) not all use the puredata.info site for sharing there work, but  
rather their own system somewhere, hence i fear you'd labor for wee  
bonus. But if you'd need it for the Gem stuff, then it'll of cause be  
in use and worth the effort.

> the good thing about it is, that it can incorporate external  
> sources as
> well (e.g. use the sf-tracker as an issue tracker)

That i don't understand.

> [...] but unfortunately(?) it suggests an organization as i like it  
> (organized
> per "package") and not as hans would prefer (organized site-wide)
>
>
> what do you think?

I guess it depends how one search for things. Or how much  
collaboration there is. Or what contents is dominant. I favor  
consistency over any specific solution. - But your "smartfolder"  
suggestion in the previous email suggested that an "either-or"- 
solution wasn't necessary?

my humble void.