[PD-dev] nightly builds for standalone libraries

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

How stable are the opencv objects?  Do you think the API will still  
change?  It would be nice to have them included in Pd-extended, but  
doing it too soon creates a lot of annoying work.

.hc

On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:57 AM, ydegoyon at free.fr wrote:

> pdp_opencv and pix_opencv have the autotools working
>
>
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> So far I've been working on an autotools build system for pd  
>> itself, not libraries. I haven't used autotools in libraries, so I  
>> don't really know what a template would look like. I guess  
>> pdvjtools would be a good library to test out those ideas.
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:11 AM, dmotd wrote:
>>
>>> hans,
>>>
>>> as an aside, what progress are you
>>> making on an automake template, do you
>>> have something that could be easily
>>> reapplied to various situations for pd
>>> libs?
>>>
>>> there seem to be a few strategies, the
>>> iem builders (iem16/iemmatrix/zexy) for
>>> one, bryan jurish's moocow builders and
>>> a set made by tim blechmann (used with
>>> flext).
>>>
>>> i still need to spend some time with the
>>> docs before i get into autotools
>>> propper. and any info would be useful.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> dmotd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Programs should be written for people to read, and only  
>> incidentally for machines to execute.
>> - from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing list
>> Pd-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>>
>>
>





----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free  
software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls  
you." - Richard M. Stallman