[PD-dev] pack~/unpack~ (was Re: multichannel signals, preliminary support)

Alexandre Torres Porres porres at gmail.com
Mon Jan 30 17:14:19 CET 2023


Em seg., 30 de jan. de 2023 às 12:43, William Brent <william.brent at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> I'm not sure if this dialog is anywhere near settled (I got lost in the
> tangle of medusa-like message threads), but here's a +1 for [snake~].
>

that's you, me, christof, matt and miller himself, so I guess we have a
winner :)


>
> I like the [object~ method] convention and the unique object name fits
> well in Pd vernacular to my ears. It seems like there's room to tack on
> lots of helpful methods...[snake~ info] could give us the specs of a given
> connection.
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:58 AM Christof Ressi <info at christofressi.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In any case, I am really liking now that "snake~" feels like an object
>> family
>>
>> Me too! It is now clear that these objects are all releated.
>>
>> "snake~ in", "snake~ out"
>>
>> Actually, I would prefer [snake~ pack] and [snake~ unpack] because for me
>> the meaning of "in" and "out" is ambigious. "pack" and "unpack", on the
>> other hand, are pretty obvious.
>>
>> Alternatively, we might just as well use [mc~ pack], [mc~ unpack], [mc~
>> split], etc. to save some keystrokes :-)
>>
>> Christof
>> On 25.01.2023 11:48, Fede Cámara Halac wrote:
>>
>> Yes, join/split would be translatable, whereas translating "snake" can be
>> slippery.
>> I do think it is amusing, btw, and slides nicely next to sigmund~ and
>> moses.
>>
>> In any case, I am really liking now that "snake~" feels like an object
>> family, that refers to the kind of signal,
>> and you can say things like "snake~ in", "snake~ out", or even "snake~
>> split", "snake~ join" ,
>> or further, "snake~ rotate/flip", "snake~ encode/decode"
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:49 AM Miller Puckette via Pd-dev <
>> pd-dev at lists.iem.at> wrote:
>>
>>> OK... now I'm hesitating between "snake~ in", "snake~ out" and "snake~
>>> tap"
>>> or "join~", "split~", and "tap~"...
>>>
>>> Former is more colorful (and crowds the namespace less).  Latter might be
>>> easier for non-native English speakers to deal with?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> Miller
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:36:24AM +0100, Christof Ressi wrote:
>>> > > Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening?
>>> > Unfortunately, these are also zexy objects ;-)
>>> >
>>> > On 24.01.2023 11:52, Max wrote:
>>> > > Isn't "mux~/demux~" closest to what's actually happening?
>>> > > when "joining" two signals, I wouldn't expect them to be running in
>>> > > parallel but being mixed together.
>>> > >
>>> > > m.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 24.01.23 02:50, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote:
>>> > > > So merging (hmm) some ideas from Fede and Dan, maybe
>>> "join~/split~", and
>>> > > > a new tap~ object that allows you to pick channels out
>>> > > > specifically.  Then
>>> > > > I think for example "clone osc~" might do OK for making an
>>> > > > oscillator bank -
>>> > > > assuming it turns out to be practical to send message-time lists
>>> to the
>>> > > > frequency input.  (Maybe that's someting clone should know how to
>>> do
>>> > > > in other
>>> > > > situations too).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > still thinking about, for instance, "clone -" to make clones of an
>>> > > > anonymous
>>> > > > abstraction that you just edit into being live...
>>> > > >
>>> > > > cheers
>>> > > > Miller
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Pd-dev mailing list
>>> > > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
>>> > >
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev__;!!Mih3wA!HryblqiKFNOUuYK6t8PJBkK26yPJYdgDiMv_z36_t9-4PQk9SJpBcxy7Jd13FSr1fRDVtVGBQd6WsA$
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Pd-dev mailing list
>>> > Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
>>> >
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev__;!!Mih3wA!HryblqiKFNOUuYK6t8PJBkK26yPJYdgDiMv_z36_t9-4PQk9SJpBcxy7Jd13FSr1fRDVtVGBQd6WsA$
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-dev mailing list
>>> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Fede Camara Halac
>> Composer / Programmer / Sound Artist
>> fdch.ar
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing listPd-dev at lists.iem.athttps://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-dev mailing list
>> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> William Brent
>
> “Great minds flock together”
> Conflations: conversational idiom for the 21st century
>
> www.conflations.com
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20230130/bd949b02/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Pd-dev mailing list