[PD] antialiasing

[doktorp]

Erm, im an idiot

it works fine with text, and looks great. sorry for the mis-info.

-dok


On Nov 17, 2003, at 2:41 PM, ben at ekran.org wrote:

> Hey there,
>
> You'll have to ask chris about the 2|4|8 thing, I think they are
> subsampling values?? Higher number means more smooth. The results look
> great, I'm really looking forward to running Gem on OSX when my laptop
> comes in.
>
> You say FSAA does not do anything on the text objects?? definatly a
> gem-dev at iem.at issue.
>
> You can get the CVS help through CVS (see the directions on the
> sourceforge site for Gem.) otherwise Chris used to have a tarball on 
> the
> same page as the binaries....
>
> Good luck.
> Ben
>
>
>> Cool, thanks.
>>
>> it was the upper case =) and it seems to work fine on OS X. Ive tried
>> it on some patches that use lots of objects (like the tabwrite 
>> triangle
>> patch posted a while back..), and it doesnt seem to use significantly
>> more processing power. (if any at all, judging by top).
>>
>> you can see the diff:
>>
>> http://homepage.mac.com/doktorp/tri1.jpg before
>>
>> http://homepage.mac.com/doktorp/tri2.jpg after
>>
>> after playing with it for a while, it doesnt seem to want to do
>> anything when using text objects though..
>>
>> also, what is the significance of 21418 ? why that number? curious
>> minds enquire.
>>
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2003, at 12:48 PM, ben at ekran.org wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> There is an extruded text object in CVS, I've not played with it
>>> though (but I think there is a help file!)
>>>
>>
>> I dont have the help file, anyone care to let me in on its secrets?
>> (besides guessing the obvious)
>>
>> Thanks again
>>
>> -dok
>
>
>