[PD] patch structure

[marius schebella]

hi,

no, $0 has to be at the beginning of a name to work correctly. so it should
be delwrite~ $0-xyz.
$0 is substituted with a unique integer value. (i think starting with 1000,
but thats unimportant). the thing is that a delayline cannot be named with a
number but only with a symbol... so delwrite~ $0 would be extracted to
delwrite~ 1099 and causes an error. if you have delwrite $0x, which is
converted to 1099x  that is a symbol and can be used (for sends, delays,
...)

marius.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thurstan" <thurstan666 at hotmail.com>
To: <pd-list at iem.kug.ac.at>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] patch structure


> So if I understand you well (I guess not) I have to use names like
>
> [pd patch_one_of_six]
>
> which contains
>
> [delwrite~ delay1$0]
> [delwrite~ delay2$0]
>
> and so on
>
> and in subpatch two_of_six I'll have to use
>
> [delwrite~ delay1$1]
> [delwrite~ delay2$1]
>
> ¿OR can I just name every object $0 and that's it? Looks a bit silly and
> unlogical to me so that will probably not be the case...?
>
> Grtz Wilf
>
>
>
> > hi,
> >
> > if you start building big patches you will find it useful to name every
> > send/receive/array/delay/throw, ... with $0-names. $0 is expanded
> patch-wide
> > with a unique number.
> >
> > this looks a bit ugly, but is still less work than controlling all names
> of
> > all of your patches.
> >
> > marius.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list