[PD] netsend/receive, a bit more

[Adrian deCleir]

as in physical sockets?
this is probably the problem alright, coz Ive kind of gathered that once one
person is connected to someone know one else seems to be connecting to them

-----Original Message-----
From: cyrille henry [mailto:cyrille.henry at la-kitchen.fr]
Sent: 25 March 2004 16:12
To: Adrian deCleir
Cc: nexyufuli evo; 'PD-list at iem.at'
Subject: Re: [PD] netsend/receive, a bit more


how many socket are you using?

I think you need 2 for each computer (they can be the same for each 
computer), because the 2 other computers will not be able to connect to 
the same socket.


sometimes it helps to connect the 3 computer in broadcast mode (connect 
to 255.255.255.255 to allow sending data to all computer connected in 
the lan.


hope this helps,
cyrille

nexyufuli evo wrote:

> . .. .maybe you try netclient / netserver of  the maxlib it works 
> bydirectional, you can broatcast ore send msg to a specific computer . . 
> . ..
> grz nos
> 
> 
> Adrian deCleir wrote:
> 
>> i dont know if anyone can help here but cheers if you can(im sure your
>> getting bored of netsend.receive questions)
>> This is a bit confusing so I hope you can have to patience to read it
>>
>> Anyway I basically have 3 computers on a LAN, I want them all to be
>> connected to each other, so
>> 1:  computer A(we'll call it) I connect to computer B and C perfectly, I
>> use a different port number each different computer,     this works fine,
>> 2: I try and then connect computer B to A and C, it connects to A fine 
>> but
>> when I connect to C it says its connected but nothing happens in C when i
>> try and affect it, so it doesnt seem to connect properly
>>
>> 3: Anyway I move on despite this and try connect C to B and A, same again
>> except it doesnt affect either B or A, so basically it says its connected
>> but when I go to change values of B and A using C absolutely nothing 
>> changes
>> in B and A
>>
>> is there limitations to netsend netreceive ?? as in the first one 
>> connects
>> with the other 2 perfect, but the next one only connects to A and the 
>> next
>> one doesnt connect properly to any of them
>> Ive done this in different orders too, like starting with C, it connects
>> perfect to B and A, but then B only connects to C and A doesnt connect at
>> all,
>> The most annoying part is the fact that its telling me its connected fine
>> Any help appreciated if you can
>> thanks adrian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PD-list mailing list
>> PD-list at iem.at
>> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list mailing list
> PD-list at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
>