[PD] C++ for pd (was: mp3 playing external)
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri Feb 4 10:33:08 CET 2005
august wrote:
> on another note, I started to rewrite the readanysf~ code.
> the goal for the new version are as follows:
> 1.) direct c++ code for pd. no more flext.
what are the advantages of such an approach ?
or rather, what are the big disadvantages of using flext ?
i do not use it myself (since Gem has its own C++ framework and my rest
is done in C), so my ideas of flext might be clouded.
the only reason to not use it that is see, is an additional dependency.
isn't it possible to link statically against flext, so the dependency
would only exist at compile time ?
or is the flext-api highly unstable (so that it is a pain to upgrade
from one version of flext to the next ?)
mfg.btr.xs
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list