[PD] PD OSX packaging redux

David Plans Casal main at davidcasal.com
Wed Nov 9 12:15:54 CET 2005


	
On 9 Nov 2005, at 10:59, Lorenz Schori wrote:

> i like this idea too. what about darwinports? btw. both of this 
> package management systems do have a mechanism to place .app packages 
> into /Applications. this option might be of interest too. i don't know 
> the internals neither of .deb nor of ports and i don't have time to 
> dive into it now - just started with my studies.
> for packaging an extended/++ self containing pd version this approach 
> might be of interest too.

I'm going to go through the fink packaging tutorial. I have slightly 
more faith in it than darwinports, so I'll start there. If anyone else 
is looking at the same time, please shout!

> just think about this possible scenario:
> 1. install pd + externals via package management (fink/darwinports)

+1

> 2. run a script which grasps all the abstractions and .pd_darwins + 
> docs.

 From where? I mean once you've installed with 'fink install pd' or 
whatever, how do you envision running the script?

I was just thinking of one big Pd.app being dumped in /Applications, 
with all needed externals pre-built.

> 3. run a script which grasps all the needed dylib's from the 
> distribution (using "otool -L")

Interesting.

> this mechanism could be extended to provide a way to easily deploy 
> custom Pd.app which just include needed externals and possibly have 
> patches autostarted.

Ok so we could have CLI instructions such as:

'pdadmin myinstallation'

And output would be a myinstallation.app/ directory with pd binaries, 
externals, etc? I guess CLI options to that would be nice. A bit like 
Django and Rails options.

Not sure though, how one would go about building this.

> @hans+james. this is no rant against you and i don't want to just 
> create another build system. i'm just thinking about how pd on mac 
> could be more conveniant for (doubleclick)users AND (cli)developers :)

And yes, why not rely on the current build systems?

Anyway, I think it's a good idea overall!

d

--
# David Plans Casal

problem.each { |day|
	assert_nil(spoon)
}





More information about the Pd-list mailing list