[PD] zexy and Pd-0.38.4-extended-RC3.app
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Wed Nov 23 17:53:45 CET 2005
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:35 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Burt wrote:
>
>> Also, when I used to load the full zexy.pd_darwin, my Pd startup time
>> was fairly slow. I didn't really test not loading zexy, but I have
>> noticed that this new Pd extended loads faster. Were the zexy
>> externals one reason load-time took so long? Do extra externals
>> effect Pd's performance? I'm wondering if anyone's done any tests.
>
> i doubt that. i can only test on linux and i don't use pd-extended,
> but here's a test i just made:
Well, if you were loading a lot of libs, and it triggered swapping,
then it would be noticably slower.
.hc
>
> zmoelnig at ferrari:~$ time pd pdquit.pd
> pd_gui: pd process exited
>
> real 0m0.466s
> user 0m0.001s
> sys 0m0.023s
> zmoelnig at ferrari:~$ time pd -lib zexy pdquit.pd
> pd_gui: pd process exited
>
> real 0m0.466s
> user 0m0.003s
> sys 0m0.017s
>
>
> the "pdquit.pd" just closes pd with a loadbang.
> so there is not really a difference.
>
> trying the same with "-nogui" i get:
>
> zmoelnig at ferrari:~$ time pd -nogui pdquit.pd
>
> real 0m0.004s
> user 0m0.001s
> sys 0m0.002s
> zmoelnig at ferrari:~$ time pd -nogui -lib zexy pdquit.pd
> ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©
> © the zexy external 2.1 ©
> © (l) forum::für::umläute ©
> © compiled: Oct 27 2005 ©
> © send me a 'help' message ©
> ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©
>
> real 0m0.005s
> user 0m0.003s
> sys 0m0.000s
>
>
> mfg.ads.r
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
________________________________________________________________________
____
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously.
- Benjamin Franklin
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list