[PD] Re: GEM cvs compile

[Max Neupert]

Am 01.12.2005 um 16:30 schrieb james tittle:
> ...you're only "sacrificing" bleeding-edge stuff that isn't quite  
> ready for primetime yet ;-)  Seriously, it should be well known  
> that compiling Gem from cvs head is going to have some rough edges,  
> because that's where the focus of development is...in this case,  
> these objects were only committed last week, and have already gone  
> thru a few iterations, with a few more likely to go...they work,  
> but only if you have the hardware and drivers to support  
> them...conversely, they are extremely undocumented, too...
>
> ...besides, they aren't likely to be the place you would start  
> learning to use Gem anyway...

on the other hand the last build is so old that i can understand very  
well why somebody would want to get a hand on the CVS version.