[Pd] Feature Request: trigger editing

[Chuckk Hubbard]

On 6/26/06, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
>
> > I can't think of any reason the current way would be better, but I may
> > be missing something.
>
> i guess the reason is: simplicity on the implementation side.
> pd has no idea about which part of the object has been deleted, it just
> destroys the old object (e.g. [t b b b]) and instantiates a new object
> (e.g. [t b b]);
> btw. sometimes it is pretty hard (even for humans and cats) to know
> which part has been deleted by just looking at the "before and after"
>
> i guess we all agree that it would be a fine feature.
> i guess nobody wants to implement it, though...
>
>
> mfg.asdr.
> IOhannes
>

Didn't think of that.  I recall that now, the old object is deleted.  Oh well.


-- 
"Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to
work hard at work worth doing."
-Theodore Roosevelt