[PD] *.lua => *.pd_lua or *.l_lua?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:

> Ah, true.
> 
>> So my suggestion would be to use something like *.pd_lua, *.pdlua or
>> *.l_lua as extension. What do you think? The same question may become
>> an issue for other loaders as well, so a standard solution would be
>> nice.
> 
> Ok, expect this change in the next release (sometime in March).  I'm 
> leaning towards *.pd_lua personally, to match *.pd_linux and 
> *.pd_darwin, but if anyone has strong objections let me know.

i too think that "*.pd_lua" would be the best choice, even though 
*.pd_linux" seems to be deprecated in feavour of *.l_i386/*.l_ia64;
since the lua-scripts are supposed to be platform&architecture 
independent the "l" and "${arch}" part so not make much sense, so i 
guess *.pd_lua is the best choice.

(the point of this email is mainly, that *.pd_linux,... is not 
necessarily the best template to build on, even though in this case it is)


fmgasd.r
IOhannes