[PD] best way to do 1/x

PSPunch shima at pspunch.com
Wed Jul 9 05:16:02 CEST 2008


I was imagining rather a single send/receive pair messing around with 
execution order of data entering at once.

Thanks a bunch though.

David Shimamoto

> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, PSPunch wrote:
>> I've never noticed send/receive causing unpredictable execution order. 
>> Can someone show me an example of under what circumstances this occurs 
>> so I can avoid future head aches?
> all cases. the receivers are ordered in the order that they are created. 
> if you are currently editing a patch, this is likely to be different 
> from the order that it will be when you will reload the patch. the only 
> way to change the order is to recreate the receivers in the correct 
> order, but really, you should seek a more transparent way of doing 
> things. For example, if [r $0-stuff] has to be received in two distinct 
> phases, make a splitter that uses a [t a a] from [r $0-stuff] to [s 
> $0-stuff-1] and [s $0-stuff-2] so that all receivers that need the 
> information early use $0-stuff-1 and the ones that need it late use 
> $0-stuff-2.
>  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec

More information about the Pd-list mailing list