[PD] Seamless recording of 2 consecutive audio files?

Peter Plessas plessas at mur.at
Wed Jan 7 11:09:34 CET 2009


Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Peter Plessas hat gesagt: // Peter Plessas wrote:
>>> i somehow assumed, that [writesf~] doesn't use scheduled messages...
>> I always thought that Pd would execute messages in between audio blocks.  
>> So if i sent two messages (stop old file, start new file), i expected  
>> them to happen in a gap between two blocks, hence gapless recorded files  
>> possible. Franks demonstration shows that i have to explicitly time  
>> those messages according to a block~ (or equivalent) in order to get  
>> this behavior. Still all blurry to me, let's look on!
> Acutally I found that my patch also works without explicit block
> timing: Just replace the [pd blockbang~] subpatch with [bang] and see
> for yourself. However it fails if you try to record less than one
> block.

Yes, that seems to work for me too! But, can you test it with stereo 
[writesf~ 2] files? I get clicks on those ones.

thanks for helping out!

regards, PP

> Ciao

More information about the Pd-list mailing list