[PD] changing graph size prevents associated arrays from being properly redrawn

[Pedro Lopes]

I have the same issue on P dual core 2, with 10-04 and rc5.

Also weird or not, I'm having the issue (a few times) on a AMD dual
core, with pd extended 0.42 (not rc5).

(i tested with array bug, although in tabwrite~ help the array syncs
very well at all times... )


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Matthias Blau <blau_m at web.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hm, not sure whether this really is the same bug.
> On the machine where I originally discovered the problem (intel atom
> processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-rc5), the arraybug.pd patch by
> hcs doesn't update the array graph correctly, no matter whether "hide
> object..." is checked or not.
>
> On another machine (intel core2 processor, Ubuntu 10.04,
> pd-0.42.5-extended-20100105), the arraybug.pd patch updates the array graph
> correctly all the time! Moreover, I can't reproduce the problem I was
> describing in my post on this machine!
>
> So, it seems to be machine-dependent?
> Very strange.
>
> Best regards,
> Matthias
>
>
> On 08/30/2010 07:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> Hey Matthis,
>>
>> It sounds like you are describing this bug:
>>
>> donecanvasdialog stops arrays from redrawing until reload
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3052388&group_id=55736&atid=478070
>>
>> If so, could you add your experience and your patch to the bug report?
>> If you log in before, then you'll be automatiaclly emailed when the bug
>> report status changes.
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:46 +0200, Matthias Blau wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I am about to update PureMeasurement and have just run into the
>>> following problem (see the attached patch pm_fftanalyzer_2ch.pd):
>>> The patch itself works for me. However, if I just change the size of the
>>> graphs associated with $0-testsignal or $0-magnitude, then those arrays
>>> will get redrawn from time to time, but not in a reliable manner any
>>> more. For instance, changing the magnitude display to S11 or S22 (and
>>> perhaps back to FRF:2re1) will eventually freeze the graph.
>>>
>>> Could anyone explain this behavior? Is the only solution to leave it as
>>> it is and not to touch it?
>>>
>>> If that matters, it happens on 0.42.5-extended-rc5 under Ubuntu 10.04.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help,
>>> Matthias
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>



-- 
Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc)
contact: pedro.lopes at ist.utl.pt
website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes