[PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Mar 9 15:40:17 CET 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2011-03-09 15:25, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>> it has to get assigned to a person.
>> this can either be done at commit time or later.
> Excuse me ? I thought that the process of assignation was just so that
> each ticket is handled by the person most competent for the topic of the
> bug report or patch (and sometimes to ensure that no person gets
> overloaded with tickets).
> If not, then what is the purpose of assigning tickets ?
so who is the most competent person for a certain ticket?
and can we expect a submitter to know? (e.g. if they haven't read the
book of rules in pd-dev)
for example, people tend to assign all sorts of tickets to hans, just
because they are using pd-extended and hans is somewhat prominently
responsible for this. it doesn't mean that he is the most competent
person for fixing a problem with, e.g. mrpeach/net
> « At commit time or later » instead sounds like the time for closing the
so the "or later" was meant as a backdoor in my argumentation to allow
re-assignment of ill-assigned topics or assignment of non-assigned topics.
"commit time" referred to the time where the ticket was initially opened
(which might not have been clear either)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Pd-list