[PD] dsp graph question

[Jonathan Wilkes]

----- Original Message -----
> From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca>
> To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
> Cc: pd-list <pd-list at iem.at>
> Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 5:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] dsp graph question
> 
> Le 2012-03-01 à 12:02:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
> 
>>  And is it possible to make local symbol tables that are separate from the 
> global symbol table?
> 
> Look into my proposals that I wrote back in 2006 or so, probably on pd-dev. But 
> I don't think I got any replies on them at all.

Oh interesting-- there's an entire thread on namespaces for send/receive.  Never 
noticed that before.

From 2006 all I see is some stuff about deallocatable symbols-- is that what you're 
referring to?

> 
>>  Additionally, if an array of scalars only send the signal to the [struct] 
> signal outlet and don't interact with each other (through [send~], [throw~], 
> [etc.~]), could one could use [setsize] to to do massive polyphony without 
> having to rebuild the entire graph?
> 
> DSP graphs allow dsp-methods to call dsp_add with all sorts of very 
> context-specific arguments such as direct pointers to the internals of tables 
> and of delwrite~ and such. To make those into context-independent things would 
> require a lot of work. But you don't necessarily need to do that if all you 
> want is just to avoid most of the recompilation whenever you add or remove a few 
> abstraction instances at any given moment.

Yes that's pretty much all I want to do.

> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
>