[PD] [netsend](tcp) is much faster than [udpsend] why??

Jonghyun Kim agitato816 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 18 03:08:43 CET 2014

I mean latency. I send OSC data in every 10ms over eth0 lan cable. With
udpsend and udpreceive there is some latency, but netsend (tcp) was all ok.


On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fre, 2014-01-17 at 18:48 +0100, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
> > I found this result that [netsend] (tcp) is much faster than [udsend].
> > It tested on between Mac and Ubuntu connected within eth0. I don't
> > know why udpsend is much slower than netsend.
> What are you measuring: throughput or latency? Maybe you can elaborate
> on your setup and on how and what you measure.
> Roman
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20140118/1d50ed8e/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list