[PD] "Done with Pd"-PR for puredata.org
mpuckett at man104-1.ucsd.edu
Thu Mar 24 18:37:23 CET 2005
By the way, "Done with Pd" is a double entendre... maybe "made with Pd"
would be a better name.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:54:59AM -0500, B. Bogart wrote:
> Comments inline...
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> >This is exactly what I mean. Another motivation could be: if you're in
> >the Workshop business, a collection of examples of what was done with
> >Pd and it possible with it is very helpful to convince organizations
> >to do a Pd workshop.
> Great idea this would certainly be a good selling point for workshops.
> >Well, very true. However I think, such a project DB should not include
> >smaller works like "I did a recording with pd, download it here:
> >Or maybe it should include something like this, too, but the larger
> >projects or works should be up front, IMO.
> I understand your rational now. Anything that exists in the PD
> documentation should probably not be in there!
> >Hey, yeah: Ratings done by voting would be a good idea. Only pd.org
> >members then are allowed to rate a project. Probably there already is
> >a Plone module for something like this. [x] needs investigation.
> Gets rid of the Jury problem and adds another level of community
> >I remember something, remember something, ... but no, I forgot: What
> >is ANN again?
> Johannes, I can't find my link for this project, what was it called? The
> one that you used the artificial nerual network trained by the life's
> work of a composer?
> The "project of the day" could just be a random grab from the top 10 of
> the voting list of projects.
More information about the Pd-list