[PD] Pd "monosymphonia"

Andrew Faraday jbturgid at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 27 23:59:30 CEST 2011

As I say, I could neaten this in a number of ways, I was considering some form of [loadbang] triggered script to delete the objects on creation, then use a delay to initialize the generative patch. Which would also solve the problem.

> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:00:40 +0200
> From: fbar at footils.org
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd "monosymphonia"
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:32:27AM +0100, Andrew Faraday wrote:
> > P.S. I do realize that I could clean this up a great deal. The addition of
> > [table] objects could just as easily be a single expanding array, I could
> > hide modules away in sub patches and the sliders used for visualization could
> > be more efficiently done with gem.  		 	   		  
> Regarding subpatches: I would do this kind of dynamic object generation in a
> subpatch anyway instead of putting the new objects into the main patch. That
> way, you can easily start with a fresh subpatch by sending "clean" to [s
> pd-subpatchname] instead of having to manually delete the created
> tables/objects.
> Ciao
> -- 
>  Frank Barknecht            Do You RjDj.me?          _ ______footils.org__
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110627/54651622/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pd-list mailing list